1. halfbloodprincestale:

    can jk rowling stop fucking around and release the half blood prince’s copy of advanced potion making as an actual book

    Reblogged from: agnosticheadstrongman
  2. whatamievensaying:

operativesurprise:

bigbootsandscaryeyes:

sammiwolfe:

fleshcircus:

thats the worst shit only because my mom basically always thought I was being a little bitch when I’d complain that it still hurts your eyes

WAIT I THOUGHT IT MEANT THAT IF YOU GOT IT IN YOUR EYES IT WOULDN’T BURN (no crying)
ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT IT’S SAYING NO RIPPING?
*FLIPS TABLES* THIS IS WHY THE ENGLISH WRITTEN LANGUAGE IS CONFUSING AS FUCK I AM SO SORRY NON-NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKERS.

Why doesn’t it say fucking anti tangle?!

I JUST MADE BOTH MY PARENTS READ THIS I AM SO ANGRY
THEY ARE ANGRY
WE JUST HAD AN ARGUMENT ABOUT ‘TIER’ ‘TEAR’ AND ‘TEAR’
THEY THOUGHT IT MEANT NO CRYING TOO
I AM SO ANGRY


it has a picture of an eYE ON THE BOTTLE

    whatamievensaying:

    operativesurprise:

    bigbootsandscaryeyes:

    sammiwolfe:

    fleshcircus:

    thats the worst shit only because my mom basically always thought I was being a little bitch when I’d complain that it still hurts your eyes

    WAIT I THOUGHT IT MEANT THAT IF YOU GOT IT IN YOUR EYES IT WOULDN’T BURN (no crying)

    ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT IT’S SAYING NO RIPPING?

    *FLIPS TABLES* THIS IS WHY THE ENGLISH WRITTEN LANGUAGE IS CONFUSING AS FUCK I AM SO SORRY NON-NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKERS.

    Why doesn’t it say fucking anti tangle?!

    I JUST MADE BOTH MY PARENTS READ THIS I AM SO ANGRY

    THEY ARE ANGRY

    WE JUST HAD AN ARGUMENT ABOUT ‘TIER’ ‘TEAR’ AND ‘TEAR’

    THEY THOUGHT IT MEANT NO CRYING TOO

    I AM SO ANGRY

    it has a picture of an eYE ON THE BOTTLE

    Reblogged from: imissnepeta
  3. note-a-bear:

kaalashnikov:

cracked:

Dark Ages, Schmark Ages. The De-Textbook cuts through that and so much more fake-fact bullshit.

cloudy with a chance of witch burning

your periodic reminder that a good chunk of Europe basically shat the bed for a few centuries while everyone else kinda did their thing.

    note-a-bear:

    kaalashnikov:

    cracked:

    Dark Ages, Schmark Ages. The De-Textbook cuts through that and so much more fake-fact bullshit.

    cloudy with a chance of witch burning

    your periodic reminder that a good chunk of Europe basically shat the bed for a few centuries while everyone else kinda did their thing.

    Reblogged from: gaimez
  4. Reblogged from: heart
  5. For as much as they tell you about Stop Drop and Roll as a kid, I really expected to be on fire more times in my life.

    Reblogged from: gaimez
  6. lightspeedsound:

    OH MY GOD

    Reblogged from: gaimez
  7. rayguncourtesan:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

    rayguncourtesan:

    trust-me-im-adoctor:

    redventure:

    juicyjacqulyn:

    entropiaorganizada:

    hookteeth:

    hethatcures:

    This legitimately upsets me.

    … Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

    So you might end up with more donuts.

    But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

    Hrm.

    HRM.

    A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

    The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
    R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


    tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

    god i love this site

    can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

    more donut per donut

    Reblogged from: imissnepeta
Next

Read More Books

Paper theme built by Thomas